Press ESC to close

Is Netflix Buying HBO Max?

In recent weeks, one key question has been making the rounds in the media: will Netflix manage to buy Warner Bros. studios and the HBO Max streaming service—reshaping the entire streaming market, including subscription prices? For the average viewer, it sounds like a dream: all the big shows “under one roof,” ideally for less money. For now, though, it’s not a done deal—these are negotiations accompanied by hard political and regulatory battles and plenty of unknowns.

As of December 2025, Netflix is one of the leading bidders for the streaming and studio arm of Warner Bros. Discovery, which includes HBO Max. Comcast and the Paramount Skydance group are competing for the same package. The outcome of these talks could significantly affect how much we’ll pay for movies and series in the future—and whether the landscape will actually simplify, or become even more complicated.

What Netflix actually wants to buy

Warner Bros. Discovery (WBD) is a media giant that encompasses the Warner Bros. film studios, the HBO brand, the HBO Max streaming service, TV networks, and other assets. In 2025, the company announced a plan to split into two separately traded companies—one grouping studios and streaming (including HBO Max), and the other traditional cable TV channels such as CNN and TNT. This move is meant to make it easier for investors and potential buyers to understand what, exactly, they would be purchasing.

It’s precisely this streaming-and-studios arm that has attracted Netflix’s interest. According to media reports, the offer is primarily cash-based, which is more attractive to WBD shareholders than complicated mixes of stock and cash. The package includes not only HBO Max itself, but also a vast library of films and series—from Harry Potter to The Lord of the Rings to Batman and a large share of HBO’s series catalogue. A content package like that would instantly move Netflix to a whole different level in both volume and variety of titles.

For viewers, this would likely mean that the Netflix and HBO Max brands would be brought into a single ecosystem. The open question is whether HBO Max would remain a standalone service within a bundle, or whether its brand would gradually fade and the content would be folded directly into the Netflix app over time. There is no official decision on this today—we’re only talking about scenarios being analyzed by market watchers.

Why people are talking about cheaper subscriptions

One of the main marketing cards Netflix is reportedly playing with regulators, based on leaks and media coverage, is the argument of “lower prices for consumers.” Reuters reports that Netflix is presenting the planned acquisition as consumer-friendly—claiming that by combining Netflix and HBO Max, it could offer a joint bundle that would be cheaper than paying for both services separately.

Looking at today’s streaming prices, an average household that subscribes to, say, Netflix and HBO Max can easily pay around €20–25 per month, depending on tiers and add-ons (for example, higher resolution or more devices). If a new bundle could shave a few euros off that total, many people would see it as real savings. Another factor is the possibility that telecom operators could offer the bundle with broadband or mobile plans, which often brings additional discounts.

But it’s important to remember that “cheaper” can take different forms. From a marketing perspective, it’s enough if a Netflix + HBO Max bundle is a better deal compared with what that combination costs today. That doesn’t mean Netflix or HBO Max standalone subscriptions would become significantly cheaper—if anything, they could remain at similar levels, with the bundle being the main discounted option. Over the long term, streaming services also tend to raise prices rather than lower them, so any post-merger price drop might not be permanent at all.

How the battle for Warner Bros. Discovery is unfolding

A key part of the story is that Netflix is not the only party interested in Warner Bros. Discovery. Comcast and the Paramount Skydance group are also pursuing the same package of assets, and each bidder has its own vision for what to do with the brands it would acquire. According to Reuters, the entire sale process is facing intense political and regulatory pressure, as WBD is one of the last major independent players in Hollywood, and any acquisition would significantly shift the balance of power in the industry.

Based on these reports, Warner Bros. Discovery has asked all interested parties to submit improved offers. Paramount Skydance reportedly prefers buying the entire company; Comcast would like to strengthen its streaming position by combining HBO Max with Peacock; and Netflix is focusing mainly on the studio and streaming arm. For WBD, it matters not only who offers the highest price, but also which deal has the best chance of clearing regulators in the U.S. and other countries.

Viewers in Slovakia may be particularly interested in whether the winning buyer would continue to develop the service offering in Europe. HBO Max has positioned itself in our region as a service with a strong focus on premium series and films, often in the original language with subtitles. Netflix, meanwhile, has a very strong local offering and also invests in European projects. In theory, a shared owner could connect these worlds—the question is whether that would mean more content for Slovakia, or simply restructuring and cost-cutting.

Regulatory risks: why nothing is certain yet

Even if Netflix offered the most money, it would still run into a barrier that can’t be easily bypassed: antitrust and media regulation. Reuters notes that all three main bidders face serious political and regulatory risks, as any tie-up with Warner Bros. Discovery would significantly increase concentration of power in media and streaming. In Netflix’s case, there is open discussion about concerns that merging two major streaming platforms would reduce competition and worsen market conditions in the long run.

In its analysis of mergers in digital and technology markets, the European Commission has repeatedly stressed that when assessing such combinations, it looks not only at the current price for consumers, but also at the long-term impact on competition, innovation, and the ability of smaller players to enter the market. In the digital environment, it can also be problematic when one company gains massive amounts of user-behavior data and can combine it across different services.

If Netflix acquired HBO Max and Warner Bros.’ full film-and-series catalogue, it would become an even stronger player than it is today. Regulators could therefore condition the deal on strict requirements—for example, obligations to license some content to competitors, restrictions on data-sharing, or even the divestiture of certain assets. It’s also possible the deal might not clear in a major jurisdiction (such as the EU) at all, forcing Netflix to find another solution.

What a Netflix–HBO Max merger would mean for viewers

From the standpoint of an average subscriber, the idea is simple: one payment, one app—and far more content. In practice, that could mean that after logging into Netflix, you wouldn’t only watch Stranger Things or The Witcher, but also The Last of Us, House of the Dragon, or Euphoria in the same app. The library would swell by hundreds of films and series that currently have nothing to do with Netflix.

A major upside could also be better content personalization. Netflix has one of the most advanced recommendation algorithms on the market, and if it could work with HBO Max content too, it might surface combinations viewers wouldn’t have thought of—such as recommending lesser-known HBO crime dramas or older Warner Bros. classics after watching The Dark Knight. At the same time, you’d no longer need to switch between two apps and two accounts.

On the other hand, less competition could, over time, lead to less pressure on quality and pricing. If Netflix controlled both its own productions and a large portion of HBO’s premium output, it could become practically impossible for some players to compete with it in both scale and prestige. Over time, that might mean fewer experimental projects, faster cancellations of riskier series, and a greater emphasis on “sure bets” that drive subscribers in large numbers.

Cheaper subscriptions: marketing promise vs. reality

Even though Netflix emphasizes lower prices for customers when communicating with regulators, it’s worth recognizing that this is also a strategic argument. In an environment where major tech and media mergers are scrutinized very closely, it’s natural for companies to highlight every possible consumer benefit—and a lower price is always among the first.

From an economic standpoint, it makes sense that a Netflix + HBO Max bundle could be relatively good value. Operating two separate services means double costs for marketing, technical infrastructure, and customer support. If some of those costs are shared, some of the savings could theoretically be reflected in the price for customers. In practice, however, it’s not automatic that companies will actually pass those savings on—they can just as well keep them as higher profit.

It’s not out of the question that Netflix would offer introductory “promo” bundles at a very attractive price after a potential acquisition—for example, for the first year or for new customers. Such promotions are a proven way to quickly boost subscriber numbers and reassure regulators. But the history of streaming services has been marked more by gradual price increases than by stable or declining pricing, so the long-term trajectory would remain very uncertain.

How viewers can save money today

While regulators and executives argue over billion-dollar deals, the average viewer is more focused on how to save money here and now. One option is annual or longer subscriptions—where available—which tend to be cheaper per month than paying monthly. Another route is bundles with telecom operators, which often include streaming as part of broadband or mobile plans at a discounted price.

“Manual” planning still works too: you subscribe to Netflix for a few months, watch the series you care about, then cancel and switch to HBO Max for a few months. It’s not convenient, but with sensible planning it can save tens of euros per year.

An interesting moment will come if the potential deal moves noticeably closer to the finish line. At that point, all services involved may launch more aggressive promotions—either to retain existing subscribers or attract new ones. But until any specific transaction is approved, relying on major subscription price cuts would be more of a gamble than a rational plan.

Video: Analysis of Netflix’s potential purchase of Warner Bros. and HBO Max

If you understand English and want to watch a video analysis on the topic, this video (commentary by a film and media YouTuber) offers an interesting take on the potential consequences of a Netflix–Warner Bros. tie-up:

Conclusion: a streaming revolution—or a step toward a monopoly?

Netflix potentially buying HBO Max and the Warner Bros. film studios is one of the biggest media topics of the past few months. If the deal went through, it would change not only where we watch series and movies, but also what the entire entertainment ecosystem looks like—from production to distribution to creators’ negotiating leverage.

The subscription “discount” Netflix talks about is more likely to be a short-term effect—primarily in the form of a discounted bundle. Over the long term, the deciding factor will be whether regulators can set conditions that preserve a minimum level of competition and prevent one company from controlling too large a share of the market. That could mean, for example, obligations to license some content elsewhere or clear limits on how Netflix can combine user data.

For viewers in Slovakia, the most sensible approach for now is to treat headlines about “cheaper subscriptions” with caution and keep watching how the situation develops. Even if a merger happens, it will take months to years before it meaningfully shows up in prices and offerings in our region. Until then, the best strategy remains sensible planning of your subscriptions and using legal ways to set up streaming so it makes sense for both your budget and your free time.

Sources

  1. Reuters – Netflix, Warner Bros Discovery combo seen lowering costs for consumers, sources sayhttps://www.reuters.com/business/media-telecom/netflix-warner-bros-discovery-combo-seen-lowering-costs-consumers-sources-say-2025-12-03/
  2. Warner Bros. Discovery – Warner Bros. Discovery to Separate into Two Leading Media Companieshttps://www.wbd.com/news/warner-bros-discovery-separate-two-leading-media-companies
  3. Reuters – Bidders for Warner Bros Discovery face barrage of political and regulatory riskshttps://www.reuters.com/business/finance/bidders-warner-bros-discovery-face-barrage-political-regulatory-risks-2025-11-21/
  4. European Commission – Merger review in digital and technology marketshttps://competition-policy.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2022-12/kd0422317enn_merger_review_in_digital_and_tech_markets_1.pdf

Jana

I like turning curiosity into words, and writing articles is my way of capturing ideas before they slip away — and sharing them with anyone who feels like reading.